Keeping Up With The Penguins

Reviews For The Would-Be Booklover

Watership Down – Richard Adams

I’d heard a lot of pop-culture references to Watership Down, but before I read it I didn’t know anything really about it (except that it was about bunnies…? maybe?). Turns out it’s a 1972 children’s adventure novel by English author Richard Adams, based on a meandering story he made up to entertain his daughters during a long road trip.

Watership Down - Richard Adams - Keeping Up With The Penguins
Buy Watership Down here.
(If you do, I’ll earn a small commission as an affiliate – which makes the bunnies happy!)

(His daughters told him it was so good, he should write it down, so he did… only to have it rejected by several publishers on the grounds that it was “too grown up for children”. So, I guess the Adams clan have mature tastes?)

The story is set in the Berkshire and Hampshire countryside, near where Adams and his family lived. As I suspected, it revolves around a group of anthropomorphised rabbits from the Sandleford warren. The inciting incident comes quickly, when a small weirdo rabbit named Fiver has a “frightening vision” of the warren’s imminent destruction.

He convinces his best mate, Hazel, to help him round up as many of their rabbit friends as possible and escape before the Bad Thing comes (he doesn’t know what it is, just that it’s Bad). Most of the rabbits tell them to bugger off, understandably, but a handful of them agree to follow Hazel and Fiver into the great unknown.

The plot device of a psychic rabbit was really quite baffling, but I tried to just go with it – and good thing, too, because most of the action throughout Watership Down relies on Fiver sensing trouble. Other than that, Adams does a pretty convincing job of depicting the lives of rabbits. He even invents language, culture, and mythology for them, so it’s thoroughly believable… again, aside from the preternatural foresight thing.

Anyway, Hazel and Fiver and co. repeatedly escape predators by the skin of their teeth. Sometimes, they befriend them (like the large seagull who later returns to help them fight off other Evil rabbits). They join – and then escape – a warren where rabbits are being bred for food. They build their own warren on Watership Down (yes, it’s the name of a place, rather than a plot point about a sinking vessel), but soon have to face up to the existential crisis of an absence of does (female rabbits). They manage to collect a couple from a nearby farm, but not enough to stave off their colony’s collapse.

So, their big final battle – the long-awaited climax of Watership Down – sees them infiltrate the Efrafra warren, ruled by the tyrannical despot General Woundwort. They manage to smuggle out enough does for requisite babymaking (like rabbits, etc), but the General is not easily defeated.

I’m not sure if I read it “right”, but Watership Down seemed to me like an indictment of anthropogenic climate change and the exploitative agricultural practices of capitalism, cloaked in a children’s story with a few made up words (the language of “lapine”, as invented by Adams). Others have read all kinds of stuff into it, too; it could be an allegory for class struggle, the Cold War, fascism, extremism… basically, Hazel and Fiver and co. are an oppressed minority who just want to LIVE, dammit, and they’ll fight to the death against the forces that would stop them doing so.

Adams, though, insists that it was never his intention to mirror such grown-up realities in his children’s book. He intended Watership Down to be “only a made-up story … in no sense an allegory or parable or any kind of political myth. I simply wrote down a story I told to my little girls,” he told the BBC in 2007. Still, whatever he meant by it, it clearly has motifs and themes that work on multiple levels.

It seemed unnecessarily long, though, particularly toward the end. It all just got a bit formulaic: just as you think the rabbits are safe and happy, a new danger arises that looks set to doom them, only they overcome it by working together and appreciating each other’s strengths. As an armchair editor, I would’ve suggested splitting the story in two, and made the whole Efrafra business a sequel (or, at least, a second volume – Watership Down 2: Back In The Warren).

As it stands, the popularity of this children’s book about bunnies persists, fifty years after its release. It’s won a bunch of awards (including the Carnegie Medal and the Guardian Prize), and it’s been adapted for film and television multiple times (including a 2018 Netflix series). I’m glad to have read it, so I can finally “get” all those pop culture references, but I doubt I’ll be revisiting it – even if there was a kid around to read it to, I doubt I could get them to sit still for long enough.

My favourite Amazon reviews of Watership Down:

  • “Uhh it was good uhh hmm which should I say uuh genralwoundfart or whatever the &)@?@! His name is loo” – nickie
  • “I believe that some time ago, some kid read this, and then began replacing the rabbits for zombies, thus, the walking dead was born.” – Mauricio Cerna
  • “Beautiful writing and boring story!” – N. Lassiter
  • “I did not enjoy Watership Down. It hink that it was pointless to write a 400+ page long book about bunnies having problems.” – N:) *


  1. I didn’t read this as a kid and I think it would have scared the daylights out of me if I had! My mum convinced me to read it when I was a teenager, if I’m remembering rightly. I believe that I was intensely skeptical about the premise of a psychic bunny rabbit, but I ended up loving it, and I do reread it. So much excitement!

    • Sheree

      January 24, 2022 at 12:52 PM

      Ahahaha I think I would’ve been a bit unnerved by all the bunny-on-bunny violence, too! And glad to hear I wasn’t the only one who found the psychic bunny carry-on a bit much 😂

  2. Ah, I loved these bunnies and their trials. It made me watch the film adaptations, and I liked the old one with the Bright Eyes song far more than the recent one. I remember reading how Richard Adams said that he had no agenda in writing it and thought many readers will find plenty.

    • Sheree

      January 24, 2022 at 12:51 PM

      I was so surprised to read that Adams had no clandestine message! I guess the cynic in me struggles to believe that someone could just earnestly write a kid’s story, and the allegories are all our own projection 🤷‍♀️😅

  3. Well, you did not love this as much as I did but I’m glad you found it worth at least one read.

    BTW I did read it to my son and he loved it. He grabbed it away from me to finish the last chapters (so much for a boring finish, at least from his point of view!)

    It’s an odd mixture of detailed nature observation and totally unwarranted anthropomorphism, but for me it’s somehow always worked. I do think it’s impossible to avoid reading in messages that have to do with human concerns. However rabbits may communicate, they certainly do not tell stories; that is very much a human activity.

    • Sheree

      January 24, 2022 at 12:48 PM

      Ahahaha it sounds like your son has a lot more patience than me! What a wonderful experience for you both though, it always warms my heart to hear kids loving their parents’ favourites 🥰

  4. I was waiting to read this review until after I’d read the book myself, and I have to say: I think I liked it a bit more than you did. My main takeaway though was that it’s cruel and unusual to keep rabbits as pets. 🤣

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *