Keeping Up With The Penguins

Reviews For The Would-Be Booklover

Lord Of The Flies – William Golding

What do you know: here we have another staple of high-school reading lists that I somehow never encountered in the course of my own education. This very edition of Lord Of The Flies, in fact, once belonged to “James Wells Year 9”, according to the inside front cover. I’m sure he’s a swell kid, but his highlighting of key passages was really distracting (though it disappeared by about the half-way point so I’m guessing he never finished the book – hopefully, he found a love of literature elsewhere).

Lord Of The Flies - William Golding - Book Laid on Wooden Table - Keeping Up With The Penguins
Buy Lord Of The Flies here.
(Piggy would be proud to know that you purchased a book through an affiliate link to support this site.)

Lord Of The Flies was William Golding’s first novel, published in 1954. It wasn’t an immediate success… and that’s putting it nicely. It sold fewer than three thousand copies in the first year, and promptly went out of print entirely. Golding eventually found his audience, though, and went on to have a glowing literary career, winning the Nobel Prize For Literature in 1983. He was also knighted, in 1988.

The introduction to this Faber “Educational Edition” makes some insightful remarks about the fact that Lord Of The Flies came so soon after WWII. The world had just seen previously-unimaginable atrocities, far removed from everyday life, and it had made everyone all-too aware of humanity’s true nature. “Ultimately, Mr Golding’s book is valuable to us,” the introduction says, “not because it tells us about the darkness of man’s heart, but because it shows it…” (page xii).

The story starts with a war-time evacuation, and a plane-full of British boys crashing on an isolated Pacific island. Golding really drops the reader right into the action; I’m not sure I would have had a damn clue what was going on if I wasn’t already familiar with the plot through the osmosis of pop-culture references. He quickly introduces two boys, the fair-haired take-charge hero Ralph and the overweight asthmatic Piggy. They find a conch, and Ralph uses it to summon all the other survivors. As far as I’m concerned, Piggy is more likeable than the rest of them put together; he keeps insisting that they “put first things first and act proper”, which made me chuckle.

The boys are a rag-tag assortment that includes a musical choir, already operating under the leadership of Jack Merridew. These boys don’t take too kindly to Ralph appointing himself head honcho. Ralph’s key policies are that they should have fun, survive, and maintain a smoke signal, apparently in that order. The choir grumbles, but eventually submits to Ralph’s vision for life on the island. Jack decides they’ll take on the role of hunters, and they spend most of their time trying to kill animals for food.

The group maintains a veneer of democracy (at first) by agreeing that whoever is holding the magical conch should be allowed to speak and receive the silent attention of the rest of the boys. I don’t know why everyone spends so much time talking about the pig’s head in Lord Of The Flies, when really Golding’s characters spent an inordinate amount of time arguing over that bloody shell.

They create a fire using Piggy’s glasses – a good start – but everything turns to shit pretty quickly. The boys start fighting among themselves, and let the fire languish while they hang out on the beach. Oh, and they imagine up a “beast” that they believe is stalking them from the woods. Jack Merridew lures the boys away from their “work” on the fire, with a view to hunting this supposed “creature”. The smoke signal dies out (duh) and they miss the opportunity for rescue by a passing ship.

Jack, fed up with Ralph’s pragmatism and Piggy’s whining, tries to start a new group. One by one, the boys abandon Ralph to join Jack, lured by the smell of sizzling pork (yes, they manage to kill a pig and cook it, but not one of them thinks to go fishing, for fuck’s sake). The members of the new tribe start doing weird shit, painting their faces and making sacrifices to the “beast”. Not sure what was in that pork, but it was nothin’ good. They end up beating a kid to death – Simon, the poor epileptic who had hallucinated the pig’s head talking to him in one iconic scene.

Jack’s New Tribe(TM) decide that Piggy’s glasses, the only means of creating fire on the island, are the real symbol of power. (Finally, they’re thinking sensibly!) They steal the glasses from Ralph and Piggy, the last hold-outs of the old group. When Ralph confronts Jack about the theft, a fight ensues, and everyone on Ralph’s side is crushed to death (RIP Piggy). The conch is also shattered in the confrontation, which is Golding’s heavy-handed attempt at symbolising the end of civility and the boys’ final transition to savagery.

Ralph manages to escape their clutches, so they hunt him through the woods, setting fire to everything in the process. He’s just about ready to give himself up for dead when he runs into a British naval officer, whose party had seen the smoke from the raging fire and come to investigate. The boys are “saved”, but they all start crying when they realise what they’ve become. The officer makes fun of them, he’s kind of a dick actually, for acting like they were at war… only to turn around and gaze at his own war ship (awkward!). Yep, Golding kept the heavy-handed symbolism going right to the bitter end.

I really didn’t enjoy Lord Of The Flies. In fact, I kind of resented it. Assigning it to school kids feels like force-feeding them a cautionary tale: “behave the way that the hypocritical adults tell you to, or look how you’ll end up!”. Really, could it be any more patronising?

In the beginning, I wondered if maybe I was just coming to this book too late in life (like I did with Fahrenheit 451), but that’s not it: honestly, my anti-establishment tendencies have only softened with age. Had I been required to read this in school, I probably would have ended up sent to the principal’s office for accusing some poor English teacher, in all earnestness, of trying to brainwash us into accepting everything they said without question (yes, I was a bit of a handful). As it stands, Lord Of The Flies wasn’t a winner for me, and I doubt I’ll ever pick it up again. It’s definitely not a book I’d want with me on a desert island, even for the hilarious irony.

I think I might be the only one who’s down on it, though. Stephen King, in particular, is a very vocal fan, and has borrowed heavily from it in his own writing; he also penned an introduction to the 2011 edition, celebrating the centenary of Golding’s birth. And public interest in Lord Of The Flies has led to the release of two film adaptations (1963, 1990). Production of another adaptation, with an all-female cast, was announced by Warner Bros in 2017; before I read the book, I was all in favour of a woman-centric re-boot, but now I feel like the project will be a huge waste. The story of Lord Of The Flies is so deeply rooted in patriarchal bullshit, I’m not sure it can be saved, even if we make them all girls. I’d much rather see that film’s budget reallocated to producing and marketing a story written by women that reflects a genuinely female experience. Someday, when I run the world…

My favourite Amazon reviews of Lord Of The Flies:

  • “It isn’t a story filled with hope. The human race is a disgrace.” – James Asherton
  • “‘Food for thought’, and I imagine that anyone who likes this book would also enjoy it if a restaurant hid razor blades in their dish. Like with real food, ‘food for thought’ should be enjoyable, healthy, and should not make you feel sick after consuming it. This book is garbage. It’s unhealthy, and it will likely make you feel sick. I do not recommend consuming this ‘food for thought’. I am not impressed. If someone wants to make a point in literature, there are better ways of going about it. This book is actually just malware for the brain. It’s best not to read it, but if you already did, sort it out the best you can. Good luck.” – S. DANIELSON
  • “This book was only boring because it is not the type of book i like but it was interesting to read.” – jack gartner
  • “Hated it. If your looking for a book that describes the scenery 90 percent of the time. This book is for u.” – Joe Pena
  • “I had to read this book for literature class I hated it. my teacher rattled on about the symbolizm in this book.It was so boring and kinda no girls, wasnt they suposed to repopulate the world after nuclear war so not possible with only boys. The one thing i found interesting was how they acted like wild animals after they had been on the island a while.that was kinda cool.But it was to confusing” – Amazon Customer


  1. I, too, was not assigned to read this book in school. I actually read it for the first time last year, at the age of 31. The first half was a bit slow to get through, but the second half, as the boys descend further and further into their paranoia, had me riveted. I see the descent into “savagery” as more of them losing touch with reality the longer they’re stranded. Ralph seems like he too is about to succumb to the paranoia when he runs into the officer.

    The novel itself is an answer novel to a Victorian-era novel called “The Coral Island” by R.M. Ballantyne.

    • ShereeKUWTP

      September 18, 2019 at 12:40 PM

      Oooh, The Coral Island – I’d not heard of it! Thanks for the heads up 😉 Glad this one worked better for you!

  2. I read Lord of the Flies when I was in high school, although I didn’t read it for high school — I was trying to read, like, The Classics, and this one seemed approachable. I’m with you though, I didn’t like it at all. It felt heavy-handed even when I was a teenager. :/

    • ShereeKUWTP

      September 18, 2019 at 12:37 PM

      I would have HATED this as a teenager! 😅 Really not all it’s cracked up to be, eh? Glad you’re with me!

  3. Lord of the Flies is a really horrible book, you are not alone in disliking it. The symbolism leaves nothing to the imagination, and the characters are all utterly reprehensible. The Amazon review about food for thought was hilarious though.

    • ShereeKUWTP

      September 18, 2019 at 12:35 PM

      So glad it’s not just me!!! And I always find the BEST Amazon reviews underneath any book that is assigned reading for high school students 😅😅😅

  4. I found it a particularly horrible book, although the underlying theme that people are just awful to one another given the least excuse does ring true. Probably why I prefer my fantasy to be more escapist.

    • ShereeKUWTP

      September 19, 2019 at 8:48 AM

      People are certainly rotten to each other, but there are other – better! – ways to make that point, and nothing wrong with looking to escape from it now and then 😉 Cheers, Phil

  5. I was assigned this book in 10th grade and after about two sentences promptly dismissed it. Haven’t ever looked it back up. Still not sure how I got an A in that class but I remember it drove a friend of mine bonkers that I was acing all the quizzes that she’d studied and studied for. 😂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *