There are a handful of really chunky books on my original reading list, and this is one of them: Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra. It seems like an age since I tackled any book even close to this long (David Copperfield was probably the only one that came close). I made sure to allot plenty of time and brain space for these 982 pages (plus introductory essays and notes). And I’m glad I did; it felt really good to immerse myself properly in Cervantes’ world, and stick with the one story for a while.
Don Quixote (original title: “El Ingenioso Hidalgo Don Quixote de la Mancha”) was published in two parts, in 1605 and 1615, with the first English translations appearing in 1612 and 1620, respectively. That makes it one of the oldest books in the Keeping Up With The Penguins project, as well as one of the longest. It’s widely considered to be one of the most influential works of the literary canon, a foundational piece of modern Western literature. Don Quixote was officially deemed the Greatest Book Of All Time by the Nobel Institute, the various editions have sold in excess of 500 million copies worldwide, and this particular translation from John Rutherford won the 2002 Premio Valle Inclán Prize for Translation. Not bad, given that Cervantes was basically unknown before the first part was published, and spent much of his life on the run (he escaped prison – not once, not twice, but four times total).
The premise is this: a member of the lesser Spanish nobility (a “hidalgo”), Alonso Quixano, becomes unhealthily obsessed with chivalric romances. He takes it into his head to become a “knight-errant”, roaming the country performing acts of chivalry under the name of Don Quixote de la Mancha. He ropes in Sancho Panza, a simple farmer with champagne dreams and a beer budget, to work as his squire. The book forms an interesting bridge between the early medieval romances, which were episodic and strung together a series of adventures with the same characters, and later modern novels, which focused more on the psychological evolution of its characters and their internal worlds. In Don Quixote, Cervantes managed to do both.
It all feels surprisingly familiar. Even the chapter titles sound like episodes of Friends: “Chapter III which relates the amusing way in which Don Quixote had himself knighted”, and so on. Cervantes certainly didn’t have any designs on founding the Western literary canon or anything of the sort. He just wanted to write a fun story that would give people a laugh or two, which is probably why his story is still so widely accessible and enjoyable for today’s readers. Of course, our understanding of it has changed over time; at first, we read it as a comic novel, as Cervantes intended, but then we started to read it as a tragic statement on disillusionment in society after the French Revolution. Later, we came to appreciate Don Quixote as a critical social commentary, but now we’ve circled around to finding it funny again. That said, I must say I’m stuck in the 20th century as far as literary critique of this one goes; critics in that era came to view the story as a tragedy, where Don Quixote’s simple idealism is rendered useless by a harsh reality. Sure, there are plenty of quick quips and slapstick encounters, but really, the truth at the heart of the story is a real bummer.
As I read it, Don Quixote seemed to be suffering from a debilitating delusional disorder, and yet everyone in his world just humoured him as he lived out his imaginary life. He was a danger to himself and others, and in today’s world we’d almost certainly subject him to some kind of psychiatric hold and get him treatment. What’s worse, he pulled Sancho Panza down with him, in a heart-breaking foile à deux that sees them repeatedly beaten, half-starved, and living in itinerant poverty for most of the book. The humour, in my view, was particularly dark, given that this ageing man’s poor mental health was the butt of most of the jokes. I found it all horribly sad.
And, of course, it’s hopelessly and irretrievably sexist, a product of its time. Almost every bloke is chasing after some beautiful woman’s virginity, which he calls her “honour” or her “jewel”, treating it as some prize they earn for gross displays of machismo. And there’s a lot of Madonna/whore smack talk. Really, the only man who seems woke in any measure is Sancho Panza, believe it or not. He has no interest in oppressing women, he just wants to get rich and fat. I respect that. Sancho’s long-suffering wife was my favourite character in the whole book, too:
“‘… you do as you please, because that’s the burden we women were born with, obeying our husbands even if they are damn fools.'”Teresa Cascajo (page 520)
I hope I’m not putting you off, though, because honestly Don Quixote wasn’t bad. I just feel compelled to share the alternative view, like I’m the lone port in a sea of “but it’s so funny!”.
I particularly enjoyed instances of Cervantes breaking the fourth wall; he was way ahead of his time in terms of being meta. His characters were aware that they were being written about, and he often made direct nods and call-outs to the reader. In Part One, he included many back-stories of minor characters, and then in Part Two, he outright apologised for his many digressions and promised the reader to focus on the matter at hand (while simultaneously whingeing that his “narrative muse” had been restrained – and never fear, he still managed to cram plenty of these hilarious digressions into the second party anyway). I heard that several abridged editions actually remove some or all of these extra tales, focusing exclusively on the central narrative. That’s a shame, because some of them are really good – so, if you’re going to read Don Quixote, make sure you go with the OG full-version.
Trying to summarise or explain the full plot of Don Quixote is a fool’s game, and I’m not going to try it here. Over the course of their travels, the dynamic duo meet innkeepers, sex workers, goat herders, soldiers, priests, escaped convicts, and spurned lovers, and Quixote manages to turn each and every encounter into a chivalric adventure of some kind. As much as he loves to intervene and prevent injustice, he’s also kind of an entitled prick and often refuses to pay his debts, which results in many near-scrapes and public humiliations (with poor Sancho often bearing the brunt). In the end, Quixote is strong-armed into returning home to live out the rest of his life as he really is, Alfonso Quixano, and he dies (essentially of depression) in the final chapter. I told you, it’s a real bummer!
There are a lot of fun facts and trivia in Don Quixote‘s history, particularly when it comes to language and translation. Firstly, its widespread popularity is the main reason modern Spanish exists in its current form, which is no small feat for one humble comic novel. Within the text itself, there are actually two types of Spanish spoken: a contemporary version spoken by most of the characters, which more or less matches today’s language, and Old Castillian, used by Don Quixote. It’s kind of like having the main character of a book speak Shakespearean English, while the rest of them speak like you and me; indeed, that’s how most contemporary English translations tell the story.
We also get a lot of proverbs and idioms from Quixote, like “tilting at windmills” (taken from one of his early adventures, where he attacks windmills believing them to be sentient giant enemies), and also from mis-translations of Quixote. The proverb “the proof of the pudding is in the eating” is widely attributed to Cervantes, but it didn’t actually appear in Don Quixote until a 1700 English translation. The original phrase was translated more literally to “you will see when the eggs are fried”, meaning something more like “time will tell”. Really, we’ve spent a couple hundred years mistranslating Quixote, and now we’re spending another couple hundred trying to correct all those mistakes. There have been five new English translations published since 2000. Obviously, I can’t speak to all of them, but I think John Rutherford did a cracking job with this one, so I’d highly recommend first-timers pick it up (and, as always, don’t skip the introduction – it’s full of interesting background and context that will help you understand and enjoy the story).
Don Quixote is a great book to read bit-by-bit; you want to sip it like wine, not chug it like beer. I’m really glad I set a lot of time aside to enjoy it properly. I think binge-reading it would make the episodes feel really repetitive, or ridiculous, or both. Plus, through the magic of incremental effort, the 982 pages fly by, and you’ll feel silly for ever having been intimidated by this doorstop book. Give it a go, and hustle back here to reassure me that this tale of an ageing poor man’s mental illness is at least equally as tragic as it is comic (it can’t just be me!).
My favourite Amazon reviews of Don Quixote:
- “I never read it and thought it was about time. Now I know and I’m of the believe that Mr Quixote and President Trump are kissing cousins” – Amazon Customer
- “IS TO BIG” – Amazon Customer
- “it is too long and too old. i got into the parts where he was fighting but everything else was a bore” – jeff rack
- “5 star book, 1 star kindle version. Book stops approximately half way through, like, in mid-sentence. Had to go to the paperback to finish.
Like the movie “Saving Private Ryan” ending (spoiler alert) just before they actually find Private Ryan.
Like the movie “The Martian” ending with the dude still on Mars.
You get the idea.
Lame.” – Fake Geddy Lee
- “It is supposedly a great Spanish classic but it is as bad as Shakespear. I got very little out of it.” – George Fox
- “What an awful book. An old madman cruising the countryside and dragging his poor servant with him. Just an awful book.” – Bruce E. Paris
September 3, 2019 at 5:10 PM
You’ve done a dynamite job with this post! I agree that DQ is a tragi-comedy, heavy on the tragedy, and that Sancho and his wife are the best characters. In my own posts I didn’t get to the aspect of the Don being an “entitled prick,” but I agree with that as well. There seems to be an image of his being a noble, well-meaning sort, with high ideals that are opposed by a cruel world, but the fact is that when he has a chance to do some real good or actually help someone, he runs away in fear, says its not his responsibility, or even beats them up and then blames them! To what extent are “high ideals” just a mask for self-centeredness and egotism? That’s where I think the real tragedy lies, beneath the fun and frolic.
Anyway, thanks for this great round-up of your experience. I’d like to revisit the book sometime and consider more of these thoughts.
September 3, 2019 at 7:57 PM
Oh THANK YOU Lory! I was a little nervous to see what you’d think of this post, actually, given your own fabulous wrap-ups and recent reading of the full text. Very glad to know I wasn’t alone in seeing the darkness! ❤️
September 4, 2019 at 1:32 PM
It’s straight on the bucket list. Your review was fabulous. I am a bit worried over the size of the book but I may get to it one day.
September 5, 2019 at 12:35 PM
Ohh wonderful, thank you! It is definitely a doorstop novel, but if you take it bit by bit, it’ll fly by 😉 Looking forward to hearing what you think of it – enjoy!
September 4, 2019 at 4:57 PM
“he just wants to get rich and fat.” what better ambitions could a man have. I’ll just go with fat, rich has too many problems associated with it
September 5, 2019 at 12:36 PM
HA! Good point!
September 4, 2019 at 8:47 PM
I think it’s pretty remarkable and excellent that book this old survived intact. I have one of the Penguin cloth bound versions, bought after I saw the Italian ballet production of it, but yet to be read!
September 5, 2019 at 12:36 PM
Amazing, isn’t it? The enduring power of a good story. Would love to hear what you think of the written version when you get to it, Theresa – I’d imagine it’s very different to what you saw play out on stage!
September 5, 2019 at 11:09 PM
I was so pleased to see you’d reviewed this, since I have a copy sitting on my shelf, ready to get stuck into some day. I’d suspected there might be dark and melancholic aspects, and your thoughts confirm it, so I’ll go in prepared, and look forward to straight talking characters like Sancho’s wife. It’s amazing that it’s still regarded by many as the best book ever written. I’m sure you’re pleased to have added it to your list.
September 6, 2019 at 4:10 PM
Very pleased to have put it on my list, read it, and I feel like it was a big jigsaw piece in reading and understanding a lot of other literature – plus, great timing, with the new Salman Rushdie adaptation! Really looking forward to hearing your thoughts Paula (given our track record as reading twins so far, I’m guessing/hoping you’ll feel much the same way!).